The fights just points to the need that the judging criteria needs to be re-evaluated, as everyone already knows. The 10 point must system will pick the "right" winner in 90% of fights but two different 10-9 rounds can be drastically different while they are scored the same.

Round 1 which was given to GSP by two of the judges was a toss up round with no real winner while the round where Hendricks rocked GSP is worth the same amount.

If I look at this as just a fight and ignore the scoring system then I definitely feel Hendricks won. However, if I look at the fight and apply the scoring criteria as laid out then it is a close fight which either fighter could have won. I can't fault the judges for giving it to either fighter.