Don't be so pessimistic more revenue earned by the UFC means they can have more contracted fighters getting paid more money. The sponsorship system had plenty of time to flourish with little interference now they are going to try to standardize it so every fighter is fully utilizing the potential for advertising partnerships. The laisez faire approach is overrated and unrealistic.
Last edited by mmawolverine; 02-15-2014 at 02:41 AM.
Way to go Dana. Next up universal banners for the corner men to hang out before the match? Somehow I doubt that this deal will get most of the fighters the same amount of money they are getting from their sponsors now and meanwhile UFC, Fertittas and Dana just get richer.
Favourite fighters: Mark Hunt, Tom Niinimäki and Anton Kuivanen
Seriously you can see the boxing and Casino influence in how the UFC runs it's business. Dana airs all the dirty laundry. And as a company the UFC seeks to squeeze every nickel and dime it can from anyone associated with it's fighters. Leaving the fighters with less sponsorship money. That money is important to fighters who may only fight 2-3 times a year. I wouldn't be surprised if you have top ten fighters holding down full or part time jobs just to make ends meet. Would it kill the UFC to let these guys keep all of the sponsorship money? Between all the other revenue streams the UFC brings in, is this really going to make or break the company? I'm no "occupy wallstreet" guy by any means, but damn this is pure greed no matter how you cut it. Let the fighters fucking eat.
Scarface: Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you, you're cool, and fuck you, I'm out!
"I don't call the fighting in my films 'violent', I call it 'action'. An action film borders between fantasy and reality. If I were to be completely realistic in my films, you would call me a violent, bloody man. I would simply destroy my opponent by tearing his guts out. I wouldn't do it so artistically." ~Bruce Lee
The interesting part moving forward will be seeing how this plays out in relation to fighter contracts. The ufc is essentially forcing a a dress code and limiting ad space for fighters who are independent contractors. This could get uglier then the time then when they were forcing fighters to sign over digital likeness rights for the video game.
Do you guys realize that Dana is a spokesperson; a decision this big surely required the consent of the Fertitas. I get that he is an asshole, but how is this Dana's fault?
This is ridiculous. Taking away the only other way for an unknown or less popular fighter to earn more money. If they do this I wouldn't be surprised for the " Fighters Union" idea to gain a lot more momentum.
"I AM THE PUNISHMENT OF GOD, IF YOU HAVE NOT COMMITTED GREAT SINS GOD WOULD NOT HAVE SENT A PUNISHMENT LIKE ME UPON YOU."
~ Genghis Khan
I actually have mixed feelings about this. On one hand, I agree with what everyone is saying about it potentially hurting other fighter's pay. However, I think the UFC's vision (not just Dana White) is to constantly expand their company into a full blown mainstream sports entity. One way to do that is by standardizing many aspects of it. Also bringing one (or many) huge sponsors to cover all their attire across fighters could overall increase the average fighter pay. I''m really interesting in seeing how this one plays out on many different levels.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)