MMA News Forums - people on my back for no reason

MMA News Forums (http://www.mmanews.com/forums/)

- Site Suggestions/Feedback (http://www.mmanews.com/forums/site-suggestions-feedback/)

- - people on my back for no reason (http://www.mmanews.com/forums/site-suggestions-feedback/20139-people-my-back-no-reason.html)

people on my back for no reason

I have only been here a couple days and already people have been on my back for the threads.

Example: Mac Danzig vs Houston Alexander
The person could have just said not possible because....
instead he needs to degrade and say some personal stuff.
(My reason was that Mac fought at 170lbs and to me could still fight as light heavyweight.)

My other comment was about Hughes and over 40 fights is plain arrogance in the professional fighting realm.
Instead the administrator has to say some degrading comment about me, yet his comment had nothing to do with the thread topic.

Another example: Will Smith's comment on Hitler
I gave my opinions on Hitler and where I thought it could be interpreted in the bible that way. The people respond by not talking about the topic but only respond to my comment on the topic. My thread is not the topic!

I have felt I have abided by the rules and respected them, I am not getting the same response not even from the administrators.

A) You insulted a fighter by claiming he has too many fights. I asked you how that makes sense (because it doesn't)

B) many of your posts in the will smith thread make no sense. They are unreadable. People are allowed to respond to a post that you make, that is why this is a discussion forum.

C) How exactly is mac going to fight a guy with 40-50lbs on him? I didn't see this thread but I can see why people would assume it to be trolling.

I had an issue with your explanation of Adam & Eve in the Noob Jack City forum, where every other topic is related to MMA in addition what to Clint just conveyed.

There is a flow and pattern to the community itself, rules not withstanding..just look at how & what your fellow community members are posting, many of which have been here a long while.

Mac Danzig fought at 170lbs where would 40-50lbs land him. Come off it Clint you have been on my back ever since I have been in here. It is the disrespect you have towards me that is against rules. All you had to do Clint was explain your point of view. My point of view of over 40 professional fights still stands as arrogance for anyone. It is simple just how much meat do you need on the table?
How much pride do you need? my point of view stands at 40 professional bouts.

It seems to me as if you guys just want me to insult you to prove your right. The religion and politics section says "enter at your own risk" The lutheran comment is accurate Martin Luther is the founder of that religion.

offended from a story makes no sense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley (Post 372965)

Mac Danzig fought at 170lbs where would 40-50lbs land him.

yes Danzig fought at 170 and walks around at about that weight. Alexander fights at 205 and walks around at I would imagine 210 to 220. No Athletic commission would sanction that fight.

Quote:

Come off it Clint you have been on my back ever since I have been in here. It is the disrespect you have towards me that is against rules. All you had to do Clint was explain your point of view.

As soon as you showed up you began making posts that make no sense and you have been reprimanded for it, just like anyone else would be

Quote:

My point of view of over 40 professional fights still stands as arrogance for anyone. It is simple just how much meat do you need on the table? How much pride do you need? my point of view stands at 40 professional bouts.

That still doesn't make any sense. What does meat on your table have to do with having 40 fights. There are many fighters who have alot more fights than that. Jeremy Horn has 100+. how is it arrogant to wish to compete as much as you can and for as long as you can.

Quote:

It seems to me as if you guys just want me to insult you to prove your right. The religion and politics section says "enter at your own risk" The lutheran comment is accurate Martin Luther is the founder of that religion.

and what does Martin Luther have to do with Will Smith making a comment about hitler?

look at some of these posts and justify how we are to not assume that you are just posting gibberish to rile people up:
(In a thread about a misinterpreted quote about Hitler from Will Smith)

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley (Post 372553)

No , NO Amen in December unless your Lutheran, or of Martin Luther, the German reformist.

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley (Post 372546)

Amen is a wind god you fool, egyptian wind god.

As far as black is concerned just the reign of King Solomon?

not every jewish person done wrong after the reign of King Solomon.

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley (Post 372542)

fools and wise men, where does the republic fit into this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by muttley (Post 372037)

According to the history channel Hitler thought he was from the lost city of Atlantis or something similar to it. The bible does seem to hint at the disasters the Jewish people have had with Germany. Jeremias Chapters 1-8. Whether or not the bible is the straight past or actually predicts the future? But I do know the bible has never been wrong. Black people as said in the bible are comely with money. Was King Solomon Black?

I am not voting for Bama nor Clinton because they don't know why they are doing things?

Example: Gays and Lesbians, Why are you supporting them other than it is not right? Where is the reason?

There is a simple reason to supporting gay and lesbians and it is not to carry on wicked children. Another Bible reference in ecclesiasticus. It is better to have no children than to have wicked children, this is the power of gays and lesbians and what makes them really good as a group.

As for the war on terrorism, I supported Bush up until the United Nations formed a new committee last year in September.

My raw feelings on the war is that if from the beginning we would have killed all of Bin Laden's family members all of them --turn their seed to dust-- Yosama would have come out of hiding and this battle would have been over in 9 to 11 months.