Originally Posted by Ramma
Kendall was the best fighter at the time that the show was done. I am not saying he, or any specific winner is still the best.
Considering he beat both Herman (not B.S.. that was a UD all the way) Starnes.. I don't see how he wasn't equal or better to them, and how it is ridiculous and/or ignorant to think so.
Call it lucky all you want, but I disagree. Right now, Kendall is not the better fighter, but when he won the show, he was.
we're definitely going to have to agree to disagree because I say that you are wrong.
Sure Kendall beat Herman and Starnes, but he was not better or equal to either of them then and he isnt equal or better than either of them now. Starnes suffered a cracked rib (credit to kendall) and Ed Herman just had a shitty night, plain and simple.
Forrest beat Shogun. Is he equal to or better than him? According to your logic, that's the case