Israel Adesanya failed to reclaim the UFC middleweight championship from Dricus Du Plessis at UFC 305. He lost the belt to Sean Strickland in a huge upset and for the first time in his pro MMA career, he has two consecutive losses on his record.
Like Kamaru Usman at welterweight and Alexander Volkanovski at featherweight, Adesanya lost his title after a dominant run in the middleweight division. He beat top contenders like Paulo Costa, Yoel Romero, Marvin Vettori, Robert Whittaker, and Jared Cannonier without much trouble.
While fans ponder what's next for him, MMA analyst Luke Thomas shared his two cents on the decline of "The Last Stylebender"...
Luke Thomas Blames Israel Adesanya's One-Dimensional Style For His Loss To Dricus Du Plessis At UFC 305
Thomas discussed why Adesanya's dominant reign ended abruptly on his YouTube channel recently. He responded to a fan asking whether Izzy never developed his skills in accordance with other fighters in the middleweight division.
He pointed out two ways for champions to dominate their weight class. They can rely on a well-rounded style like Islam Makhachev who possesses dangerous wrestling alongside accurate boxing and kicks. Or, they can master one facet of their game like Khabib Nurmagomedov who was an unstoppable force due to his wrestling despite never having a commendable standup.
You can be dominant in the UFC via two different models. One is, you are sort of well-rounded but you've got one ace in the hole. And you know, you can play the levels a little bit if you have to, but you kind of lean on your strengths. And that's a common skill set like Islam is kind of like that, right? Or you can go a little bit more like Khabib where, you know, you can get by on the other stuff as long as you might need to for a couple of minutes. But you've got one skill set and it's way better than everybody else and you just lord that over somebody like the Khabib model. Izzy was kind of always on that second model.
According to Thomas, Izzy's dominance at middleweight was similar to Nurmagomedov's. He had decent takedown defense but outscored all his opponents on the feet. His wins over Whittaker and Alex Pereira exemplify this perfectly.
The combat sports analyst also highlighted that Adesanya never submitted an opponent in the UFC and most of his wins came in a similar fashion. He used this to explain why the former UFC middleweight kingpin couldn't sustain his dominance like José Aldo, who's still winning fights after making his promotional debut in 2011.
He got pretty far but could you argue, had there been a little more development and weaponization of the ground game or a bare minimum like submissions, you know, had he got taken down and have to spend time constantly fighting or if his wrestling had gotten really good, what could that have done like Jose Aldo.
Although Thomas brought up a couple of notable holes in Adesanya's game, he called him the second-best middleweight of all time without a doubt. So, even though "The Last Stylebender" has struggled to beat the new generation of middleweights lately, one can't deny that his striking prowess was enough to make him an all-time great.